Shames argues that America's economy and lifestyle is founded around a belief of steady expansionism towards monetary and personal gain; a constant stream of advancement that is considered the American Dream. Shames says that this belief contradicts the truth of the matter: that our resources are dwindling as we move more towards consumption than production, as seen by the average income increase by American citizens (a decreasing increase at that)--a fact that many in our slowly recessing economy are aware of.
There is truth within this essay, but I would argue that one point Shames makes seems off the mark. He states that only Australia and America share a pioneering experience, but that's not true: America and Australia are both an extension of British imperialism. Likewise, this shows how our frontiers are not limited, but that we choose to limit ourselves (and thankfully). If one looks at nations such as China, we see that expansionism is not inhibited by human rights in the face of industrial mobilization; that Tibet and other smaller countries can quickly be militarily or economically conquered. Thus, our limitations as industrialists and producers might not be a bad thing, but just different.
Essay #2: Frumpy or Chic
Shneider discusses how fashion has wriggled its way into academia, or more likely has been there all along. The debate between "fab" and "frump" plays out as different professor's offer their opinions on fashion; a proverbial fashion show of wits, odd attire, and personal fashion statements. This is something we're all aware of: everyone has that cool, hip professor who wear's sporty coats and collared shirts rolled up, and likewise they have the polyester and stripes sort of woman.
There are several weak points in Shneider's discussion (I wouldn't quite call it an argument, as no final conclusion is really made), namely the fields of the professor's she interviewed. A large majority seemed to be English majors, art majors, or in women studies: all extremely liberal and creative fields. There was a large absence of scientists and economists--individuals who might not necessarily be as affected by fashion. It seems that fashion only affects those who need to make a very overt self-statement. In all, academics should let dress come naturally as a reflection of their style of teaching, and not try to warp one into the other.
No comments:
Post a Comment